You are correct, and especially correct that it remains an "issue". That issue is whether or not the Constitution and federal law as extant today unequivocally define the unborn child as a person.
A few think that it does, that a President and AG could simply prosecute abortionists under the existing law. I don't agree, I think Congressional action to clarify the Fourteenth is needed. And to keep a future Congress from reversing that action, only an amendment will work.
Antonio Gramsci was studied by Saul Alinsky who formed Obama into a marxist. Gramsci stated that there are 10 steps to bring a marxist society to the US: change the popular consensus; destroy Christianity, the traditional family, and existing social mores; transform the culture; install a radical Left mind-control; attain political power; impose strict control of the military and law enforcement; restrict freedom; socialize the economy; erase American sovereignty; and embrace a world without borders.
Gramsci believed the US could be destroyed from within through abortion, lax divorce laws, homosexual marriage, women's rights, pornography,hate speech laws, media and attacking education. It's working.
If the answer is yes, why would you support a system that permits a state to declare the baby to be a nonperson?
If the answer is no, why oppose abortion at all?
Read Blackmun's opinion in Roe, he clearly acknowledges that once the unborn baby's personhood is established that any arguments in favor of abortion collapses because the baby then enjoys 14th Amendment rights.