Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ISS to be sunk after 2020: Russian space agency
http://www.physorg.com ^ | 07-27-2011 | Staff

Posted on 07/27/2011 12:43:34 PM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Then what was the point of putting it up there in the first place? What science has been expanded by its being there? Has the ISS been useful at all?...............................
1 posted on 07/27/2011 12:43:39 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Rubbing salt in the wound. The One made us abandon space travel because it “offends” Him. We can’t do anything to stop them.


2 posted on 07/27/2011 12:45:57 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Has the ISS been useful at all?.

Yes.

3 posted on 07/27/2011 12:46:13 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Can’t they just shoot it out into space? Was a waste of time and money anyway—should have been stomping around on Mars by now.


4 posted on 07/27/2011 12:47:22 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

No. A complete waste of money.


5 posted on 07/27/2011 12:47:40 PM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Too bad they are going to junk it in the first place, but why don’t they just push the thing into outer space instead of polluting the planet with it?


6 posted on 07/27/2011 12:47:50 PM PDT by bridgemanusa (loan MA Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Too bad they are going to junk it in the first place, but why don’t they just push the thing into outer space instead of polluting the planet with it?


7 posted on 07/27/2011 12:47:50 PM PDT by bridgemanusa (loan MA Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

What a complete crock. Stop whining. It’s not becoming.


8 posted on 07/27/2011 12:48:35 PM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
This makes it sound like Roscosmos makes the decision.

They don't.

9 posted on 07/27/2011 12:48:48 PM PDT by Regulator (Watch Out! Americans are on the March! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Launched in 1998, the ISS...”

Very misleading. The first piece went up in 1998; but, I remember touring NASA in 2000, and touring mock-ups of all the stuff that had yet to be launched.

Wikipedia says it is ‘expected to be finished in 2012’.

So literally this thing will spend 8 years in space as a completed component.


10 posted on 07/27/2011 12:49:39 PM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
Was a waste of time and money anyway—should have been stomping around on Mars by now.

Instead, we threw trillions of dollars for the 'war on poverty' (based on our debt, I think poverty won).

11 posted on 07/27/2011 12:51:00 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

12 posted on 07/27/2011 12:51:59 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What I can’t figure is they’ve spent billions and billions of dollars to haul all that mass off of earth and into orbit. Why just drop it back into the ocean? Why not boost it up into some parking orbit, where it will be out of the way and then it will be there if for nothing else, then spare parts for some future space station. Of course that sound too much like common sense, and nobody ever accused the powers that be of having that


13 posted on 07/27/2011 12:52:26 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Doing what?
What is its purpose?
Does it even have a purpose?...............


14 posted on 07/27/2011 12:53:25 PM PDT by Red Badger (PEAS in our time? Obama cries PEAS! PEAS! when there is no PEAS!..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

It would be insanely expensive to rocket-up the thing and give it enough velocity to kick it out into “space”, and even then it’s going to come back at some time. It’s cheap as hell to fire simple rockets to reduce the orbital velocity and bring it down.

Nothing wrong with the Russian plan, considering the ISS will be obsolete by 2020 (barring other changes). Skylab and Mir were both-deorbited successfully.


15 posted on 07/27/2011 12:54:44 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Auction it off on E-Bay...

Buyer MUST arrange shipping and delivery..(G)

16 posted on 07/27/2011 12:55:15 PM PDT by ken5050 (Save the earth..it's the ONLY planet with CHOCOLATE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

By then Bigelow Aerospace will have inflatable hotels orbiting the Earth lifted into place by the Falcon 9 rocket family care of SpaceX.


17 posted on 07/27/2011 12:55:33 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The reason you can’t boost it into earth-escaping flight/travel is a matter of pure economics. It would actually take A LOT (and we’re talking REALLY a lot) of fuel to boost its speed beyond the necessary amount to escape earth’s gravity.

On the other hand, it really only takes a small, calculated, well-timed nudge to bring it down in the South Pacific. It probably has the fuel on board as we speak to do that.


18 posted on 07/27/2011 12:56:56 PM PDT by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Well, thought it might be too much to send it out of orbit...shucks!


19 posted on 07/27/2011 12:57:19 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

What does that mean?................


20 posted on 07/27/2011 12:57:36 PM PDT by Red Badger (PEAS in our time? Obama cries PEAS! PEAS! when there is no PEAS!..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson