Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

why do we need a “federal controlled substances act”? If a man wants to smoke, dope, or shoot himself to death he should be welcome to do so.


3 posted on 07/27/2011 10:59:15 AM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: utherdoul

“If a man wants to smoke, dope, or shoot himself to death he should be welcome to do so.”

I agree, provided he doesn’t expect the rest of society to clean up his mess.


5 posted on 07/27/2011 11:14:00 AM PDT by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (I don't have hobbies. I'm developing a robust post-apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: utherdoul
why do we need a “federal controlled substances act”? If a man wants to smoke, dope, or shoot himself to death he should be welcome to do so.

It's an interesting question, but irrelevant. We have a Controlled Substance Act, and that is that. It's not going away anytime soon, and it is supreme law notwithstanding state laws to the contrary.

7 posted on 07/27/2011 11:16:32 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: utherdoul

“If a man wants to smoke, dope, or shoot himself to death he should be welcome to do so.’

Were it only so, that the consequences of one person’s acts applied only to himself! But you know that when marijuana is legalized, the reset of use will pay many times over: we will pay for the drug itself as part of some federal health plan, just as we already pay for dubious psychotherapies and various chiropractic treatments.

Then we will pay for the results: crimes by intoxicated “medicated” addicts, and treatments and support when their brains have been fried by years of psychedelic therapy.

I would be willing g to loosen drug laws if every person were required to pay for his own healthcare. By the way, then people would take much better care of themselves, and health standards might actually improve.

But we are far from this state of freedom, when a huge proportion of the population collects food stamps, apparently unable or unwilling to even feed themselves.

An infantile, dependent attitude (encouraged fully by the government) is well excepted in our declining society.


9 posted on 07/27/2011 11:28:16 AM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: utherdoul
why do we need a “federal controlled substances act”?

It's for the children. /sarcasm

43 posted on 07/27/2011 1:54:01 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson