Hypothetical talk really should not count as a threat, although it might be a reason to investigate the talker.
When I tried to see if anyone had posted this yet, I searched “ Bagdasarian” and there was quite a lengthy thread at the time of his original conviction. Most posters were not in favor of the conviction.
I believe in sites self policing, and I don’t hesitate to hit the abuse button herein if something is truly racist. Its important that trolls not be able to post garbage here, and then have others say this is a site with hate speech.
But those of you with an ax to grind against the 9th circuit, why not take the time to get to know the court better? One way is to look up the en Banc (all justices) oral argument in the Norris v City of Santa Cruz.
You can actually listen to it, if not view it as well. A lot of interest during that oral argument, by the justices in preserving our free speech, the cornerstone, IMHO of our personal freedoms.