Replies

If Gaddafi knew about the Lockerbie bombing in advance it's sure strange that he would have this argument, in private, with his own people. In fact it's strange that an omnipotent tyrant would have any argument with an underling instead of just having him executed.

That kind of depends on whether you treat statements by Mr Shalgham and Muammar Gaddafi as gospel truth.

To say the least this doesn't do much for your British propaganda.

So when Colonel Gaddaffi and the Libyans put their case forward, that's fact. When I put an alternate theory forward, thats "British propoganda"?

Enjoy the oil!

What oil is that? Britain gets <1% of its oil from Libya. Curious. When the US led the invasion of Iraq the left took it as read that it was all about oil. Do you buy into that argument?

That kind of depends on whether you treat statements by Mr Shalgham and Muammar Gaddafi as gospel truth.

What reason would Shalgam have to lie now? He has defected, he is against Gaddafi now so why tell a story that implicates himself and exonerates Gaddafi? Use your head now and then.

So when Colonel Gaddaffi and the Libyans put their case forward, that's fact.

I guess using your head is out of the question.