How do we know that this “manifesto” is not a fraud? Sounds like someone trying to create a phoney manifesto started with the Kaczinski one as a template. Too convenient, I think.
Ahh. The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy??
Obama, Soros, etc don’t even care anymore about appearances anymore. When they are ready to take our guns, they will. When they are ready to collapse the economies of the world, they will. When they are ready to put you into a camp, they will.
They’ll do it and we’ll complain on FR and maybe some commentators on FoxNews will comment, but they know that, individually, we still have too much to lose to do what this guy did to make his point.
If you don’t have some skills that will be deemed “essential to the public good”, you should start working on getting some soon.
I agree.
What did he google “manifesto” ??
“How do we know that this “manifesto” is not a fraud?”
A lot easier to false flag this attack to cover Islamic terrorism like by just cutting and pasting.
There are good grounds for wondering, as blogger at Unercoverage points out:
“There is no proof of Breivik’s motivations for the crime as yet. There is considerable evidence and the method and technique suggests an Al Qaeda “Mumbai” multi-bomb, multi-location type attack. Recruitment and radicalization of “locals” is not new to the Al Qaeda movement. There are many “white” American jihadis who were recruited to various Al Qaeda sects over the years. [Investigative Project for Terrorism.]http://www.investigativeproject.org/3052/shabaab-essay-boasts-of-western-recruits
As reported previously here at UNCOVERAGE, there is a long litany of Islamic extremist activity in Norway.” http://www.uncoverage.net/2011/07/91-dead-in-norway-right-wing-extremist-theory-ignores-al-qaeda-threats/#comment-36931