Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385

‘The NRSC would not exist....”

If that’s the way they play then we need to have a debate about whether or not they should exist.


13 posted on 07/24/2011 11:05:49 AM PDT by Gil4 (Sometimes it's not low self-esteem - it's just accurate self-assessment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gil4

I feel the same way about the NRCC. In 08 they threw my conservative congressman overboard. They declared that he had no chance and stripped him of funds. He lost by a whopping 2% and we were stuck with a marxist for two years.

My conservative congressman was reelected last November whether the NRCC wanted him or not.


14 posted on 07/24/2011 11:11:58 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Gil4

That debate most certainly does need to be had. The NRSC only serves the interests of K street lobbyists and carrer politicians not the people, or the states. It amplifies the power of incumbency, nepotism, centralized government, and control of the party by politicians, instead of control of politicians by the people working through the party structure. I see no positive reasons for the NRSC or NRCC to exist.


20 posted on 07/24/2011 11:36:00 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson