[loveliberty2]

Any man, especially a father of children, who knows that he is going on national television on a weekday morning, uncensored, and, with that knowledge, in the presence of the nation's children, utters the vile, graphic image in words of his accusation against the father is unfit to appear as any sort of "authority" on a reputable network.

That was a shocking and inexcuseable choice of action on his part on behalf of his client, because he knew the shock value, as well as the fact that the unedited version would air as he spoke, thereby polluting the minds of innocent children.

[Dr. Scarpetta]

he knew the shock value, as well as the fact that the unedited version would air as he spoke, thereby polluting the minds of innocent children.

I thought the same thing...

[miss marmelstein]

Oddly enough, as soon as this bottom-feeder started talking about George’s “molestations,” I knew poor old George was as innocent as the day is long. You can only go to the well once too often with that claim. It was used in the Menendez Brothers trial too but the jury was way too smart to buy the argument. Unfortunately, this jury was way too dumb and bought it hook, line and sinker. A few freepers as well!