Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA
At one time most of our criminal laws were for acts that were "malum in se", that is they were wrong in and of themselves such as stealing or assault. Now, most of our new criminal laws are "malum prohibitum", that is there is nothing inherently wrong with the act but it is criminal merely because it is prohibited by the government. This trend closely tracts the loss of individual freedom and the strengthening of the power of the state.

We are not now, and I believe never will be again, the Country of free, independent people our Founders envisioned.

10 posted on 07/23/2011 12:36:58 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Prokopton
At one time most of our criminal laws were for acts that were "malum in se", that is they were wrong in and of themselves such as stealing or assault. Now, most of our new criminal laws are "malum prohibitum", that is there is nothing inherently wrong with the act but it is criminal merely because it is prohibited by the government.

There was a time when someone could avoid breaking laws just by doing what was 'right'. Your concience could be your guide.

Now, what is legal and what is right are barely overlapping subsets.

50 posted on 07/25/2011 1:48:15 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson