Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato

That would require having pull aircraft out of service for extended periods for modification; putting in a modified fuel tank probably takes lesser time and needs lesser rewiring.

OTOH, the Super Hornet international roadmap concept does have an integrated IRST below the nose.

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/5/4/8/1866845.jpg


8 posted on 07/22/2011 4:42:55 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki
That would require having pull aircraft out of service for extended periods for modification;

Not all that long. You'd do it during a regularly scheduled depot maintaince period. Or maybe even during other scheduled maintaince at the unit level. Modern units would have smaller electronics "boxes", but the actual sensor head would be about the same size. Those were as I said, in a fairing just under the windscreen. You're probably correct about the wiring though. The center-line station is likely already wired. The IRST is not an imaging sensor, so only control, power and aircraft "state" information (pitch roll yaw, and maybe angular rates) need be supplied, while the output would just be "hits", which would be pretty low bandwidth compared to a video signal, and would likely be accommodated on the existing digital data bus, except for the power.

10 posted on 07/24/2011 3:55:33 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson