[metmom]

Libertarians argue that we can’t define marriage because any definition moves us down a “slippery slope” toward undue interference with personal freedoms.

Bunk.

Well said.

By demanding that the government allow all kinds of *marriages* under the guise of *not defining* them, it FORCES the government to define marriage.

From the government's position, it's a lose/lose situation. By defining it as the traditional monogamous, one man/one woman at a time scenario, libertarians don't like it. By refusing to define it, the government IS by default defining it as anything goes.

What libertarian and others want is that the government define it the way THEY want, under the false premise that it is a neutral position.

When if comes to moral issues, there is no neutral position.

[little jeremiah]

Well said!

Check your freepmail in a couple of minutes.