“The story is they married because she was already pregnant.”
If that is true, I find it disturbing. It’s yet something else the liberals can say is hypocrisy on Gov. Palin’s part. Even though obviously, Track was already a grown man, in the military and not living at home when this happened. It’s a good thing that afterwards they did the right thing and got married. Most people shack up these days and don’t even bother to make things right.
In this day and age children rarely live out the values the parents set out for them. However, I still find it sad. What’s even more sad is that I think the girl he married was a preacher’s daughter. If so, wow that stereo type about preacher’s kids is right on the money in this case.
All being said, Gov. Palin is not her grown kids and they are not the ones who would be running for President. I still support her but, it’s still a sad situation.
What about this story can possibly make Sarah a hypocrite? Just because the media deemed it so for some strange reason?
To be fair, are we asking Sarah Palin to be a tyrant to her own family even past the age of her children’s majority? Sarah Palin certainly walked the talk herself, and a sin of premarital sex isn’t made any better by getting an “easy abortion.” Besides in that family it would have been a moose-gun wedding rather than a shotgun wedding, and the sweethearts opted to omit the firearms altogether.
IF CHILDREN WERE DISQUALIFYING ASSETS FOR A CONSERVATIVE PRESIDENT... RONALD REAGAN WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ELECTED. Patty and poofter boy... man oh man.
Some of you (not directed at you) are going to have a rough time with Saint Peter when you get to the Gates.
LLS