[CharlesWayneCT]

I thought we knew what was wrong. According to the defense, the child drowned in the pool, George “took care of it”, and told Casey to keep quiet. Under that theory, since the child was already dead, there wouldn’t be any pressure for the mother to “report a missing child”, because she would know the child wasn’t missing, but was already dead.

I’m not taking the defense’s side on this, just saying that their story is consistant and would answer your particular objection.

[Dr. Scarpetta]

According to the defense, the child drowned in the pool, George “took care of it”, and told Casey to keep quiet.

There is not one shred of evidence to support that theory.

[jwalsh07]

I’m not taking the defense’s side on this, just saying that their story is consistant and would answer your particular objection

Which certainly explains the sick bitch partying hardy while her baby lay rotting in the swamp.

[jwalsh07]

I’m not taking the defense’s side on this, just saying that their story is consistant and would answer your particular objection

Which certainly explains the sick bitch partying hardy while her baby lay rotting in the swamp.

[GOPJ]

A family member was part of the original search team ... I remember talking to him after some of those long - very long - stressful days looking for the child. If 'George' knew, then he also took advantage of the good people living in that community - the people who came out to help.

I live in Florida - kids drowned in pools here - no one tapes their mouths shut and dumps their little bodies in the woods. No one sends the community out to search snake infested swamps when they know the child is dead.

That said, I didn't watch the trial until it was almost over... so their story might have been 'consistent' within that one frame of reality...