“The quality of the federal judiciary has been going downward in general in the last several decades, so this will only grease the skids more.”
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
All going according to plan, justice is not taught in law school, a sense of justice is a character trait that can be found among those of good character and little education but not among those of low character regardless of how many law degrees they may hold. The planned takeover of this country is dependent upon, among other things, a federal bench filled with those of low character and no sense of true justice.
What law school does teach is how to say patently absurd things in such scholarly language that it sounds almost reasonable. We have one judge on the South Carolina appeals court who was called out by James J. Kilpatrick many years ago in a newspaper column for using such obscure language that Kilpatrick, who was known as a master of the language, said that he had to consult every dictionary he could find to try to puzzle out the meaning of what the judge had written. I have followed the career of this judge for forty years and have found nothing to like or admire about him, not surprisingly he is held up by the profession as a role model.
Yes, legal education in the United States has been tilted far to the left for decades, especially in the elitist law schools, and it's the left's plan to saturate the bench with their products, thus undermining the Constitution and the rule of law.
Of the nine on the SCOTUS now, for example, I believe that all but one is an alum of either Harvard or Yale law schools, the other from Stanford. So three elitist law schools account for the entire SCOTUS! No "diversity" there.
A good recent book about legal education in the US is "Schools for Misrule: Legal Academia and an Overlawyered America," by Walter Olson.