Posted on 07/18/2011 10:09:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
With the House poised to vote on a debt-ceiling increase tomorrow, the White House has released a threat to veto the bill if it reaches the President’s desk. This statement was just released by e-mail, emphasis in the original:
The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 2560, the “Cut, Cap and Balance Act of 2011.” Neither setting arbitrary spending levels nor amending the Constitution is necessary to restore fiscal responsibility. Increasing the Federal debt limit, which is needed to avoid a Federal government default on its obligations and a severe blow to the economy, should not be conditioned on taking these actions. Instead of pursuing an empty political statement and unrealistic policy goals, it is necessary to move beyond politics as usual and find bipartisan common ground.
The bill would undercut the Federal Government’s ability to meet its core commitments to seniors, middle-class families and the most vulnerable, while reducing our ability to invest in our future. H. R. 2560 would set unrealistic spending caps that could result in significant cuts to education, research and development, and other programs critical to growing our economy and winning the future. It could also lead to severe cuts in Medicare and Social Security, which are growing to accommodate the retirement of the baby boomers, and put at risk the retirement security for tens of millions of Americans.
Furthermore, H. R. 2560 could require even deeper cuts, since it conditions an increase in the Federal debt limit on Congressional passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment. H. R. 2560 sets out a false and unacceptable choice between the Federal Government defaulting on its obligations now or, alternatively, passing a Balanced Budget Amendment that, in the years ahead, will likely leave the Nation unable to meet its core commitment of ensuring dignity in retirement.
The President has proposed a comprehensive and balanced framework that ensures we live within our means and reduces the deficit by $4 trillion, while supporting economic growth and long-term job creation, protecting critical investments, and meeting the commitments made to provide economic security to Americans no matter their circumstances. H.R. 2560 is inconsistent with this responsible framework to restore fiscal responsibility and is not an appropriate method of reducing the Nation’s deficits and debt. The Administration is committed to working with the Congress on a bipartisan basis to achieve real solutions.
If the President were presented this bill for signature, he would veto it.
A few points seem remarkable here. Is it really Barack Obama’s contention that a balanced budget, now or in the future, threatens the dignity of retirees? What basis does he have for claiming that deficits are a necessary component of retiree dignity? That sounds very much like a demand for eternal deficit spending, with no attempt at any discipline whatsoever.
As far as Obama’s “comprehensive and balanced framework,” CNS News reminds us that the only specific plan Obama has published actually increases deficit spending rather than decrease it:
While the Republican-controlled House of Representatives has voted this year to approve House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R.-Wis.) proposal–that would put the government on a gradual path to a surplus by 2040–and plans to vote on a balanced budget amendment next week that would cap federal spending at 18 percent of GDP, the only budget proposal President Obama’s has publicly revealed in 2011 would, according to the Congressional Budget Office, increase the deficit by $26 billion this year, $83 billion next year, and $2.7 trillion over the next decade.
Additionally, although annual budget deficits would decline somewhat between 2013 and 2015 under Obama’s proposal, according to the CBO, after that they would start increasing again, going up every year from 2016 to 2021, the last year estimated by the CBO.
In short, the only budget proposal Obama has put forward this year for the public to review and analyze puts the federal government on a path to eventual bankruptcy.
The CBO report from April can be found here. This chart shows that Obama’s projected budget produces bigger deficits by percentage of GDP than anything seen since 1981 — with the exceptions of the Democratic budgets to 2008-11. They’re worse than the baseline we’re on at the moment, and not coincidentally, they make the debt load appreciably worse as a result:
If the CCB bill gets through the House and the Senate, would Obama really veto it? He’d have to defy a Senate controlled by his own party to cancel a debt-limit increase in a situation that his own administration has relentlessly hyped as a fiscal Armageddon. I’d call that a real long shot.
Call his bluff, GOP.
Yes, and there is much more to come.
The MSM and regrettably too many conservative commentators just dismiss the Senate response to House-passed legislation as "it won't pass the Senate."
That is NOT the point. With every step of strategery, the House is going to force vulnerable Senate RATS (Tester, Manchin, Sherrod Brown, both Nelsons, McCaskill, etc) to vote on many things they abhor politically. If they vote with the GOP, they infuriate Reid, Obama, and their fundraising Left. If they vote with Obama, they infuriate their constituents in 2012 -- these are all red states with Obama at the top of the ticket. Bottom line: Reid cannot protect them, so let's bring it on. All of it.
Say good night to Tester, both Nelsons, McCaskill, and hopefully Manchin and Sherrod Brown, as well.
Keep all the phone calls going to Capitol Hill both GOP and Dem members - House and Senate. It matters. TEL 202-224-3121.
Please see post 61 and reconsider what matters and what does not.
We are living at the whim of world class corruption.
I find no compelling evidence there will BE an election next year.
More and more everyday, I feel this way.
And I've had this feeling since on or before Jan. 20, 2009
Your conclusion would be correct IF that were all the House was going to do -- pass the cut, cap and balance bill.
There is more to come -- much more -- to demonstrate to the public that it is Obama who is being unreasonable.
Strategery.
Cut, Cap & Balance bill: HR 2560 (PDF)
Balanced Budget Amendment HJ RES 56 (same as SR RES 10)
HJ RES 56 Joe Walsh sponsors with 59 co-sponsors include Issa, McClintock, Pence, West and Wilson
Michele Bachmann is AWOL.
SR RES 10 Hatch sponsors with 47 co-sponsors. It looks like all GOP senators on board including squishy types like Brown, Collins, Graham, Lugar, McCain and Snowe.
One Congress cannot lock future Congresses into a spending plan. That's exactly why the Balanced Budget Amendment is part of this plan. That does have the teeth to hold Congress accountable long term, regardless of parties in power.
You can argue the initial year's cuts are too small but claiming this plan does "nothing" is as silly as it is wrong.
The Balanced Budget Amendment will not pass. No meaningful spending cuts will pass. If the gutless wonder “GOP Leaders” have their way, Comrade O will get his increase in debt limit (lest nervous GOP plutocrats be inconvenienced in any way) and his political slush funds. Lucy...Charlie Brown... football. Again and again and again. Pie in the sky bye and bye.
Right you are. Don’t take any guff from the peanut gallery. We have Rush, Sean, Mark Levin, Marco Rubio and a lot more. We don’t need the quislings like Boehner and McConnell.
now that that cut, cap and balance is shut down, his next move is to use the 14th amendment to skirt the congress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.