It would take a lot of work to “shop” every shot for nearly every day since 1979. Strange that they would do that and leave the “shopped shots” showing little to no change in Arctic ice too. Kind of a waste of propaganda effort wouldn’t you say?
Once you have an algorithm and a set of source data down you can crank these charts out at gigahertz speed. No need for manually touching up a whole series when a kink in the algorithm will touch them up for you.
It probably would be, but maybe I’m reading these wrong, the purple has declined significantly on those images, that would show a change in the ice.
And, of course I just glanced at them.
I am just one of those people who trusts nothing, and questions everything out of the Ministry of Propaganda (ie anything to do with the environment, climate or the EPA), and their branch that pushes such agenda (ie any of the federally funded universities that deals with climate).
If Al Gore and his ilk came out and said the sky was blue, I swear, I would go outside and look, and if it was indeed blue, I would head directly to an optometrist and get my eyes checked.