All good points. Note that at the original site, “Julian Brown” is withdrawing his stance.
http://ecatnews.com/?p=489#comment-70
admin
July 17, 2011 - 3:19 pm | Permalink
Hi Julian…
That is interesting.
Please understand that, while trying to guard against malicious lies, I am keen to report on any side of the argument should the source be qualified. The background you cite is obviously well within that net and what you say is potentially important, if true.
Do you have some evidence of your visit and/or your identity? A letter of invitation, a photo, a website where your position can be verified?
On the specifics of your observation, if I had been working on a boiler for four years and understood its performance, I would not bother to try to prove it to myself and every visitor with the appropriate instrumentation. To me, that would be a waste of my time.
Your stated observations – taken at face value – would imply that a child could see the truth of the poorly performing eCats. Surely such an accusation is a terrible insult to those we know who did examine the devices closely?
And finally, while I understand (and respect) your reluctance to accuse Rossi of fraud, any indication that the device does not meet the specs he claims is indeed an implicit accusation of fraud – if not by him then surely by Defkalion who tell us that they work on the cores all the time and never get less than a multiplier of 19.
Can I also get another thought that is bugging me…
If you are on the level, I thank you for your comment. People need to hear what you have to say. However, unless you are using a pseudonym, why would a patent examiner risk his career by saying such a thing in public before an official patent is processed?
Paul
Reply
Daniel de França MTd2
July 17, 2011 - 9:48 pm | Permalink
I did not find any name Julian Brown related to EPO, except for an
inventor with this name:
Reply
Julian Brown
July 17, 2011 - 10:25 pm | Permalink
Can i ask you, for the sake of my family, to remove my submission to your blog.
It was sent in good faith, because I really care about the LENR field and don’t want it to suffer yet another set back, but I see I may have stirred up a hornet’s nest.
Julian Brown
Reply
What people want is to see this hooked up to someone's house to generate electricity and see what happens.
Probably won't happen as soon as we'd like. Still, a thought for everybody. When I enclosed the interior of my garage area under my house it cut my monthly power bill about $50.00 ~ even though there was no direct air leakage from that area to the rest of the home. There was heat conduction through plasterboard and cement block.
Frankly, I didn't expect that at all, but it did encourage me to recommend that all folks buying a new house under construction PAY SOMEBODY to extra caulk the seams!
Later, when I replaced all the incandescent lights with fluorescent lights, that whacked my monthly power bill another $50 bucks. More recently the installation of a brand new thin line flat screen LED driven TV cut about $25 a month out of my bill.
We are getting down to cutting out heating and AC Fur Shur, but I digress.
We may see some results by October, but maybe not as quickly as we'd like. By January it should be possible to quantify the power curve by looking at demand served.