[nickcarraway]

I am not bearing false witness. You think Cardinal Ratzinger was lying? Why don't you call the Catholic League tomorrow and ask them if the articles in which he was quoted as supporting civil unions was accurate. I bet they don't answer you.

What is so important about him to you?

[HiTech RedNeck]

What does this very orthodox screed, which modulo the Roman Catholic specific references could be agreed to by devout Christians across myriad denominations, has a hoot in hades to do with BILL DONOHUE?

Cat fight. Big, ugly, mangy, puffed up cat fight.

[HiTech RedNeck]

The cardinal brings up the matter of civil homosexual unions and begins to coolly catalog a case of why they’re wrong, and exactly how faithful Christians can in serene conscience throw sand in the gears of civil homosexual union machines. The late noted Anglican apologist C. S. Lewis could have written something like this except for the Roman specific references.

If Cardinal Ratzinger switched gears somewhere in this thickly written tome and pronounced “oh, psst, don’t bother with everything else I said, I’m copacetic with homosexual civil unions and so should you be” then it’s up to you to point out the place, or get rudely barracked yourself.

[buccaneer81]

What is so important about him to you?

Why do you hate him?