That's what this movement is about across the various states and nothing else.
Isn’t there a “not” missing before “count”?
How about we split the electoral votes by percentage?
There are a couple scenarios that probably have not been thought through on this:
1. In a two-way race, a candidate could theoretically WIN enough states to reach the 270 electoral vote threshold - YET, still LOSE the popular vote. Any states that he won [who are part of the compact] would then switch their votes and the other candidate MIGHT go over the top electorally.
2. In a three-way race, NONE of the candidates might get at least 50% of the popular vote AND NONE of them might reach the 270 electoral vote threshold - BUT, the leading candidate MIGHT receive compact states’ electoral votes from the others and could CONCEIVABLY go over the top. Kinda negates the provisions of Article II, Section I and the 12th Amendment concerning the selection of the President and Vice President when a plurality has NOT been reached.