To: tlb
I have a low opinion of both sides - that is the whalers and the Sea Shepherds.
2 posted on
07/17/2011 2:52:51 AM PDT by
DB
To: DB
Sea Sheppard group = terrorists, pirates (their ships should be sunk) :)
4 posted on
07/17/2011 3:25:38 AM PDT by
Sporke
(USS-Iowa BB-61)
To: DB
I have a low opinion of both sides - that is the whalers and the Sea Shepherds. Yeah, me too, but I'd like nothing more than to see the Japanese sink the Steve Irwin and Bob Barker, and watch Paul Watson push his hippies out of the way as he scrambles for his lifeboat.
To: DB
The vast majority of the whales they harvest are species which are not endangered. As long as they stick to those I don’t see a real issue.
7 posted on
07/17/2011 4:40:51 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: DB
Perhaps you are right. But there is NO valid reason for hunting whales at present. These whalers are a pointless brutal anachronism.
8 posted on
07/17/2011 4:47:02 AM PDT by
ZULU
(Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
To: DB; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ..
Thanks tlb.
I agree with DB.
15 posted on
07/17/2011 7:06:38 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: DB
I have a low opinion of both sides...Agreed; but I have a lower opinion of the pirates than of the whalers. I heard that there is good news in this season's Whale Wars; a few dead pirates, maybe.
17 posted on
07/17/2011 8:06:52 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson