Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia

Besides foisting an absurdy forged birth certificate on us, this Social Security number thing is NOT Trivial.

In the days when his number was assigned they still had a lot of manual processes from before everything was computerized.

In order to minimize having to walk between file cabinets to manually store and retrieve paperwork for millions of records, social security numbers were grouped by location.

A social security number from CT makes absolutely no sense at all- especially when the number above and below his are also assigned from the same location in CT (proving the location theory)


10 posted on 07/16/2011 7:47:11 AM PDT by Mr. K (CAPSLOCK! -Unleash the fury! [Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K

Please don’t misunderstand, Mr. K. I’m simply curious if this is being researched anywhere else. I’m interested in the research aspect of these claims.

I completely agree that there are myriad issues with BHO’s presidency if not his name and identity altogether. Something doesn’t smell right, and I have a feeling we’re going to have a Tom Clancy-esque revelation at some point proving that Obama is not who he says he is nor is he eligible for the Presidency.


21 posted on 07/16/2011 9:36:00 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson