Where there's a suggestion a candidate may be light in the loafers they can select to show only the pictures of sublime domesticity and meetings with young women on the beach. Fur shur they will suppress the pictures of the candidate with men's swim teams, guys in speedos, all male parties and the like (they did that for Coons in Delaware BTW).
Or, if Google.com doesn't like a candidate, they might show 5 pages of "candidate head shots" before the first picture of a woman shows up.
Barney Frank, BTW, a well known homosexual, goes only 3 pages before a woman shows up!
Once I'd figured out that Google.com can control what pictures get revealed on the internet, I realized that such evaluations (how many guys, how many women, who has clothes on, who is nekkid, are there kids in there) are probably pretty useless except to this extent ~ that what Google.com wants you to see will help leftwingtard homosexual candidates, and hurt Republican heterosexual candidates.
That's their corporate bias!
Rick's collection is almost all headshots of him, and that goes on for 5 pages! I don't think the gay blades at Google.com like Rick very much at all!
What I’ve read regarding Perry has been somewhat disturbing, but not being Texan I don’t have firsthand knowledge. I see what Texans have posted here, regarding illegal immigration and that weird attempted landgrab via eminent domain for the TTC, and those two alone set me on edge. Then, I see “evangelicals” urging Perry to run, a huge prayer vigil with him as apparent centerpiece ... it’s discomfiting, to say the least. Then, there are the gay rumors lurking about.
If he’s the force to be reckoned with that some purport him to be, he needs to have a thorough public vetting much as Sarah Palin has had. Air it. I don’t want another ringer sliding in there, too much is at stake. My heart is with Sarah, but there may be need for a backup candidate. I hope not, but it’s possible.