Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edcoil; wita
I was curious, so...

Plural of “mother-in-law”

:)

9 posted on 07/15/2011 7:09:52 AM PDT by mewzilla (Forget a third party. We need a second one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla

The noun (mother) is what the plurality is, therefore it’s motherS in law. Think attorneys general, surgeons general, and the like. The adjective phrase (in law) remains the same, because there are not more laws being generated by the union.

Your referenced site is, to be blunt, wrong.

Just because “everyone” does something does not make it correct.

Don’t get me going about personal pronoun usage! < LOL >


11 posted on 07/15/2011 7:20:38 AM PDT by Don W (You can forget what you do for a living when your knees are in the breeze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla

I’m not real big on Language based on usage. There are rules and laws for language just as with life, etc. One reason, I might add, that the Constitution has managed to assume the toilet tissue role it has managed over the years, not based on law, but on usage or lack of.

At least when I grew up the rule was, the noun/subject got the plural.


15 posted on 07/15/2011 7:29:11 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla
I was curious, so...

Plural of “mother-in-law”

:)

I always thought the plural of M.I.L. was Coven.
28 posted on 07/15/2011 9:17:32 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson