Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
I'm afraid I have to disagree. The language develops by this kind of thing. You are seeking to codify it into what is "right" and "wrong" by making grammar unchanging, which I grant is superficially appealing, but it also means the language will stop developing.

On the contrary, the example of "you" and "thou" you give is very salutary. "Thou" was the singular and "you" was plural. Now "you" is both plural and singular and "thou" is archaic. My reading of the current situation is that x years from now (and I don't know how long it will take) "they" will come to mean not only "more than one person" but also "one person whose gender is unknown". This does not destroy a grammatical principle, it merely alters the grammatical rules. It won't be the first time that has happened and I'm confident it won't be the last either.

62 posted on 07/19/2011 4:50:56 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Vanders9

Yes, it may happen, but at this point in time singular “they” just sounds ungrammatical, and, further, unnecessary.


63 posted on 07/19/2011 5:23:47 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson