Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
I think you can get round the problem in various ways, and as variety is a good feature of English and a main reason why it has produced such good literature over the years, it is something to be aimed at!

In the example you gave, I would have said "Whoever wins this raffle will have a nice prize" and in the second example, I would personally have just left the last two words off. Problem solved. However, I am beginning to hear things like that last example a great deal more, and although it is grammatically incorrect, it sounds very natural to me.

56 posted on 07/19/2011 12:59:11 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Vanders9
I agree that the ungrammatical "they" is a solution in search of a problem. Of course, my examples were artifically compressed into a single sentence. Usually, the speaker drifts from singular to plural and back, so even when no single sentence is ungrammatical or strained, the entire speach is.

although it is grammatically incorrect, it sounds very natural to me.

No. This practice destroys an important grammatical feature. Although I have to admit that would nto be the first: the English did drift into mixing "thou" and "you" a long time ago, and more recently, subjunctive "were" and "was". But neither of these corruptions were salutary either.

57 posted on 07/19/2011 6:20:21 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson