Exactly the point.
You all make excellent points. Additionally, what about the first-in-time, first-in-right issue?? IOW, when a school is proposed to be built in a certain location, why would the municipality have the right to strip gun shop owners, homeowners, and regular users of nearby roadways of their rights without compensation or a careful study of the impact. Maybe locate schools so this law has the least impact on people who had rights they may have held dear. Has anyone ever even heard the issue raised when there’s talk of a new school?? Just one more line of proof that the law is invalid on its face.