“as any student of macro-ecomnomics knows, that which you tax you get less of (successful savers) and that which you subsidize you get more of (freeloaders).”
That’s just simple supply-and-demand. Which goes to show you, there’s no such thing as “macro-economics” that’s not micro-economics or pure psuedo-mathematical bunk.
FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY SOMEONE HELP ME!!!
I am so freeking frustrated and confused that I feel like an absolute idiot that I’m not understanding this...
McConnell says not a single R will vote to increase the debt ceiling. But then he also says later that they, I assume meaning the WH, will get their increase. WTF AM I MISSING HERE?!
I get that he proposes this option that makes the President ask for the increase, which would then fail in the House but then how does that jive with saying the debt limit will eventually be increased???
DeMint is out there saying that the limit will be increased. How if no R will vote for it?
AAAAARGH!!
If they really think that raising the debt ceiling in exchange for a “hope” that the Dems will make promised cuts means these guys are complete and utter jackasses who don’t understand the sh!t storm about to come there way.
You've apparently never studied economics or logic - OK, got it.