Posted on 07/13/2011 7:10:03 AM PDT by MindBender26
You're so dramatic...
Another one resorts to namecalling. Gees, it’s getting old. Keep your chin up! Love seeing your comments. I find you to be fiesty and committed to justice no matter what anyone else around here says.
I see. Good thing you are are in position to cast your opinions on us lowly posters, but we don’t dare have the right to offer our opinion of the vaunted jurors in this case. I see how it works. Get off your damn high horse and move on to other threads so we can find out how we should be reacting to those issues, too.
Don’t waste your time on that guy. You’re right, and he’s wrong.
I know. My chin is up and thank you. I appreciate it.
LOL
O K then
The jurors where twelve individuals. They all come from separate backgrounds and are of a multitude of races, colors and creeds, yet they all agreed on six counts after weeks of trial in less than a day. That is pretty impressive. It shows how week the case really was. If it was the least bit stronger you would think at least one juror would have held out for a guilty verdict, but not one did, not even for a little bit.
I highly doubt that you could get 12 of your friends and relatives to agree to where and when you should meet to have a dinner party in less than twelve hours and you know and presumably like all of those people. That is not to disparage you or any of your friends. That is just to get you to realize how difficult it is to get twelve individuals to agree on anything.
The point is that the jury decided. The did their job. A juries job is to come to a unanimous consensus on a verdict in each and every indictment. They are tasked to do so to the best of their ability by following the instructions they where given by the judge. This is a near impossible task. Yet, they did it so quickly, Why? Because the prosecutions case was very week on all counts except her lying to the police and the defense basically stipulated to that during the course of their defense. You are taking all of this very personally. You have become emotionally involved in this case and that emotion is clouding your reason. Take a step back and look at what they where really able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
I believe the reason why it has gotten so much exposure is because the mother was young and attractive and so was the child. And let's not forget that they are white and from a middle class upbringing.
The day this case started in Florida a case started in Dayton against a woman that killed her infant child by putting the baby in a microwave. An unimaginable and disordered crime. Yet not a word in the national media.
Right now a case is going on here in Cleveland concerning Anthony y Sowel. This man raped and killed at least 11 women and buried them in his home and in his back yard. It is a major serial killer case. Eleven women all raped and murdered and that is the ones they know about.
None of these women where reported missing by their families, not one of them. They where all on the edges of society separated from there families by drug and alcohol abuse.
Not one national story about it this week, not one! Why?
The defendant and the victims in these cases are all black and poor. Nobody missed them and nobody cared. Eleven women. Three additional victims have testified that they where raped and escaped. The police NEVER followed up.
As tragic as the Casey Anthony case is, it is only one case of a killing in a country of 45 murders on average a day. Over 17,000 per year.
I agree with you about Casey being young and attractive and her baby being cute.
Of course she is. That kid was so cute and it is terrible what happened to her, But it tragically happens dozens of times a year to so many children and that is just after they are born. Over 1.5 million children are killed by their mothers every year before they eve have the chance to be born. Almost every one of these parents are tried in open court and many are acquitted for just the same reasons that Casey Anthony was. Yet almost none of these children are heard of outside of their home towns.
That is allot of what i am saying. We have to have perspective about this case.
By your reasoning, most conversations would be “irrelevant.” When a little evil witch leaves her 2 year old to rot in a swamp and then 12 idiots let her go free, you can bet there will be “conversation” about it. And it’s more “relevant” than the drivel about weather, sports and the latest program on TV.
PS were you on the jury?
“They did what they believe was right. It doesn’t mean they don’t believe that she did it.”
Umm, HOW COULD THEY HAVE DONE WHAT THEY BELIEVED IS RIGHT when they thought her guilty yet voted NOT GUILTY?????
I understand you find it a hard concept, but it is really quite simple. I believe in God. I know there is a God. But I certainly can not prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
I know I love my Mother. How can I prove it beyond a reasonable doubt?
The Burden of the State in a criminal case is very high. It should be high. We are talking about removing the liberty and possibly the life of a citizen. They better show proof of the manner of death and they had better be able to prove that the defendant can be tied to that manner of death. The state of Florida was unable to show either of these in the eyes of the jury.
They can think it is most likely that she was involved in her daughters death, but they couldn't even rule on a cause of death and weather Casey was present at the death.
As for any body elses thoughts on the relevance of the evidence., If you weren't on the jury your beliefs about her guilt and the states case are irrelevant. They have no bearing on the case in any way . Nor should they.
I am not emotionally involved in the case, in fact, I did my best to ignore it despite being surrounded by the case in Orlando. I still don’t get why you feel others on this board are not able to have an opinion on the quality of the verdict.
By your standards, every jury in US history has come the correct conclusion....that a jury can not be flawed simply because they are members of a jury. This makes no sense. Do you take the position that every verdict by jury in US history was correct? If not, why is this jury somehow immune from criticism?
Already filed.
The jury simply collectively believed that the state didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty of murder. Based on the evidence that has been shown: no conclusive cause of death, no forensic evidence that the child was ever in the trunk, no witnesses, no DNA, no fingerprints, no direct evidence of any kind. The jury came to the conclusion that the state didn't prove guilt of murder.
Regardless, the outcome has exonerated Anthony and any further action against her criminally would go against the spirit, if not the letter, of double jeopardy.
How many times should the government be able to try a case? until they come to a decision that you agree with or the one that they want? come on, the case is over.She has been judged not guilty!
There is no reasonable conclusion to be made about the jury other than the fact that they judged the states evidence insufficient to conclude guilt.
Remember, we are talking about twelve people, not two or three, twelve. It would be amazing that twelve people of diverse back grounds would all believe that state failed to meet it's burden so quickly had the state actually had a reasonable amount of evidence to convict.
What makes so many of the people on this forum believe that they know something better than the twelve citizens forced by law to endure a six week trial? nothing! They simply are upset because their perception of the case was warped by 24/7 coverage and analysis. The jury saw only the case that the state was allowed to show by law. Based on that evidence twelve people concluded the state couldn't meet it's burden of guilt for the murder charges.
As you have posted numerous (15+) times and I agree the trial is OVER!
But one thing that I wish you in your Great Wisdom would relate to me and maybe others, is a trial a Search for the Truth, or acquiring Justice? There can be only one Truth!
If it is the later, Justice for the Victim or the Antagonist?
Thanks.
By the way we in Florida probably wish the Anthonys would have stayed in OHIO! :-}
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.