Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: He Rides A White Horse
to understand that the will of the State supersedes the rights of the individual..

It's the will of the people that there children are condemned to a lifetime of disease and bad health?

12 posted on 07/13/2011 3:09:48 AM PDT by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: raybbr
It's the will of the people that there children are condemned to a lifetime of disease and bad health?

What sort of utopian commune were you raised in?

13 posted on 07/13/2011 3:28:51 AM PDT by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr
I'm a little busy at the moment, but I'll give you a quick response.

It's the will of the people that there children are condemned to a lifetime of disease and bad health?

Here is the problem. I believe in the Constitution. Particularly the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment was never a problem until the left showed up with its poison pill pop culture trash. In the 1800's, kids would take their guns to school, and go hunting afterwards. There was no Columbine. People thought nothing of it.

Fast forward to today. Government is trashing our Constitution, and we hear the relentless calls for gun control, it will make everybody safe. What has transpired over time that guns are now considered dangerous?

Our culture has evolved into a very sick society because of people who have managed to foist their destructive, twisted ideologies upon us all. The result? America caters to the criminally minded, not law abiding citizens. In this particular example, criminals are rewarded for bad behavior, and law abiding citizens are deprived of their rights.The right to protect their families, to defend themselves against those who would victimize them. The irrational takes over. A feelgood delusion that lures people into a very false sense of security. Banning guns is the sorry conclusion. The delusion is obvious; criminals are not going to comply because they are criminals.

Do you fear a law abiding citizen simply because he is armed? I don't know how you feel, but I have no sense of fear or concern whatsoever.

Back to your statement.

It's the will of the people that there children are condemned to a lifetime of disease and bad health?

The will of the people, at least as far as I am concerned, is that government will start with this child, and I guarantee you it will become a blanket over the rest of us. Once government enters an arena, it will continue its encroachment. Undoubtedly you have heard of attempts to ban salt in restaurants. If I'm eating a steak, I like salt, and resent people trying to control the majority because of some obese child. I'm not trying to sound cruel in stating that, but that is exactly what happens. The ironic thing is that those who control government and the media have the gall to point the finger at everybody else. It's simple logic really. Are law abiding citizens those who are committing violent crime? A resounding no. So why do these left wing 'do-gooders' insist stripping away our rights? Preposterous, isn't it?

You know what is a great problem in America today? A radical, vocal group of people who seem unable to mind their own business. Most people simply want to be left alone, and it was a good system until these misguided ideologues showed up.

"We're going to teach your 3rd grade kid that it's okay to be gay, whether you like it or not." "Does Daddy own a gun?"...an endless stream of intrusion.

The point is (and the framers of the Constitution seem to agree) that the people are more trustworthy than politicians. I'm sorry if some kid has poor eating habits, but I don't think social services is the solution.

I'll check back later, if you want to have some civil discourse. Gotta run.

29 posted on 07/13/2011 8:10:42 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse ((((unite))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr
Quickly.

Dr. David Ludwig, an obesity specialist at Harvard-affiliated Children's Hospital Boston, said the point isn't to blame parents, but rather to act in children's best interest and get them help that for whatever reason their parents can't provide

Think about it for a moment. Some may see a benevolence in this statement. This idea could apply to anything that the State perceives as parental obligation. Which could include teachings that the State interprets as "harmful". Religious beliefs for example. Am I on some flight of fancy? No. Political correctness and the radical beliefs of the left are prime examples of this dangerous attitude.

Ask yourself. Are there things that the left insists are enlightened and good, things that you find offensive?

30 posted on 07/13/2011 8:27:54 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse ((((unite))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr; Gabz

“It’s the will of the people that there children are condemned to a lifetime of disease and bad health?”

I knew you wouldn’t stop with your support of usurping private property rights. Nanny staters never stop. I am not surprised that you’ve moved on to supporting further expansions of government.

Please explain to us again why you are on this site?


42 posted on 07/14/2011 6:32:00 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson