And you know this how? Just because that's the way it may work in your state (or most other states) does not necessarily mean that is how it will work in Hawaii. They have STRANGE birth certificate laws. Ship born children can Claim birth in Hawaii.
Your point is beside the point anyway. If Obama has a "born at home" affidavit as his original record, followed by an adoption (By Lolo Soetoro OR his Grandparents) it will create a fake replacement birth certificate that looks exactly like what we see. Do you have some piece of evidence that proves this didn't happen? The circumstantial evidence implies this is a very credible scenario.
You: And you know this how?
Because I looked up the Hawaii statutes that govern changes in the BC that result from an adoption. I already forwarded you the links before. Here they are again.
For a child born in-state, the law onlys allow for the names of the parents and the child to be altered upon adoption:
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0020.htm
For a child born out of the country, the law clearly states that the BC will list the child's true country of birth as the place of birth:
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0020_0005.htm
If Obama has a "born at home" affidavit as his original record, followed by an adoption (By Lolo Soetoro OR his Grandparents) it will create a fake replacement birth certificate that looks exactly like what we see.
No, it would not. Since the law only allows for changing the parents' names or child's name, the new BC would still indicate he was born at home if he really did have such an affidavit. Since the current BC lists a hospital as the birthplace. we know for sure his original BC included no such affidavit.