Obama Sr and Mama Stanley intended to put him up for adoption too.
/// i haven’t seen that. a link would be interesting.
but, that simply is irrelevant. Whether they did or didn’t, doesn’t matter. so why would you mention that,
and ignored SWORN AFFIDAVITS of credentialed experts,
that the US President has offered a forged document?
clearly forged documents (including his selective service form) ARE relevant.
an IMPOSSIBLE CT SSN, owned by the US President,
IS relevant.
and here are some links to a few of the things i mentioned.
(and, that retired General had 10 CIA experts, who also said it was forged.)
= = =
why do some words curve less than others?
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=186343
how can signatures be in different resolutions on the same document, unless one of them was pasted on?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2720608/posts?page=23#23
and boxes that are identical down to the pixel?
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/irrefutable-proof-obamas-new-birth.html
why do other documents show the security paper background as they are supposed to, but this one LFBC doesn’t?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2722377/posts?page=259#259
I aint interested in this folly.
That issue is dead on. I opened a copy of the BC from the Whitehouse server, and I was shocked at how the boxes were Identical, and appear to be the obvious byproduct of eliminating birth info for twins. Twin info had to be replaced with empty boxes, so the boxes are copy and pasted from another area on the document.
The governor made a big stink about looking for the document. He was actually setting this up.