So does it not look anything like those other certificates, or did it use those other certificates as templates? I don't see how you can have it both ways.
which happen to be original documents
The WND article says, "Exhibits 3 and 4 show Gretchen Carter Nordyke's birth certificate number in a positive developed from the original Hawaii DOH-issued photostatic copy." So no, they're not original documents--they're copies of copies.
Where is obama's original BC?
In a binder in some Hawaii DOH office.
Where is obama's original BC?
In a binder in some Hawaii DOH office.
******
REGISTRAR ONAKA: Why won't Onaka and President Obama let reporters look at the original long form since President Obama has already VOLUNTARILY showed the world a copy of his long form birth certificate to great fanfare at a White House press conference on April 27, 2011?
That is, why is Registrar Onaka claiming that he cannot allow reporters to see the original long form birth certificate because of Hawaii privacy laws, when President Obama has already VOLUNTARILY released his long form birth certificate to the public on April 27, 2011?
I thought that President Obama gave up his right to privacy when it came to his long form birth certificate when he VOLUNTARILY released his long form birth certificate to the public on April 27, 2011.
It looks to me that Registrar Onaka is trying to conceal something by hiding behind Hawaii's privacy laws as he refuses to let reporters examine the original of a document that the President of the United States has already VOLUNTARILY released to the public.
In a binder in some Hawaii DOH office.
Well then, what is the problem with getting a DOH-issued photostatic copy?