>>Would the mail in be pro-rat?<<
I’m pretty sure now that most of that 39,000 votes initially counted was mail-in. On one site I read that there were 42,000 or so cast by mail, so it looks like the mail-in broke for the Dems.
The part I don’t understand is that somewhere else I read that Dem mail-ins were only running about 2% stronger than Republican mail-ins. I’m guessing that, since registration is known, they could tell how many Dems and how many Reps had sent ballots back in by mail, even though they hadn’t been opened yet. That doesn’t explain the 8% difference so far though, unless Independent mail-ins broke for Dems?
TX. I am going to be up lat. I will watch it. How do you think it will go?