Hey it a a victory for the Constitution, right?
To any FReeper defending the Casey Anthony jury.
This is what you get. The innocent pay, the guity walk free.
Liberal tainted justice.
I defended AND STILL defend the Casey jury and no FReepers will bully me into backing down on what I know is right. Seems to me, no one here has all the evidence in this case either, but all are quick to judge....
That said, it is VERY plausible the jury was tampered with (which is illegal) in any case dealing with unions. Not so with the Casey jury. It’s apples and oranges. So u can stop attempting to brow beat the Constitutional loving/defending Conservatives on FR. k?
Only an unmitigated moron would equate the two. One had direct evidence, that was ignored by a stacked jury. The other expressly lacked evidence, was over-charged, and was taken to trial too quickly because of PR pressure in a high-profile case, and a proper jury recognized it as such.
This is why Liberals get away with idiotic ideas like sentencing equality, as if every drug conviction is entirely equal. They're not. Many will make deals, offer evidence against bigger dealers, has extenuating circumstances, had weapons, etc etc etc. Sadly, too many pathetic minds allow the MSM to equate any similar verdict, and nod their empty heads in agreement.