Posted on 07/12/2011 10:47:57 AM PDT by ejdrapes
You can bet that the Democrats and their friends in the media have a thick folder on every potential 2012 Republican candidate. The one thing we know - they are out of ammo when it comes to Palin. They have tried everything for the past three years and come up empty. If they couldn't find anything in nearly 20,000 e-mails, there's nothing to find.
It's the primaries. This is when the wheat gets separated from the chaff. The rubber hits the road. If Bachmann can't handle the attacks, then she either needs to hire bloggers who can get her message out, hire better campaign managers than that pond-scum Ed Rollins, or quit and focus on Congress as she should have been doing all along.
OK, so then does that same standard apply for Palin?
Nope, because Palin was part of a national ticket. Of course, conservatives should have been outraged and defended her. Had McCain selected Bachmann as VP, I would have defended Bachmann too.
Because she certainly had/has plenty of defenders on talk radio, blogs, Fox News etc. Are the attacks against Palin her problem too?
Not anymore. The media wasted their ammo on Palin. Any future attacks on Palin will be met with shrugs and her supporters will ignore them, leaving the media in red-faced, incoherent rage over nothing. All the more reason why Palin should be the nominee.
The left fears and hates strong women, unless they are good little Marxists like Hitlery.
On MSNBC they are doing a story about her husband’s clinic trying to cure homosexuals. I couldn’t listen any more. Like Michele would ever get the homosexual vote. LOL
Do not recall anybody at the NRO coming to Palin`s defense.
While MB is getting some arrows from the MSM, still much/most of her support is also from the MSM.
Chris Matthews,Andrea Mitchell,Every MSM/Rep est pollster etc etc
EXCELLENT POST!!!!!
Should MB follow RP and declare she is not running for re election to the House?
That isn't what you claimed. You claimed she was part of the Republican establishment. That utterly ridiculous, a lie and simply meant to smear someone that is standing firm for conservative principles.
Why? Because she threatens your candidate?
If you had any confidence in your own candidate, you wouldn't have be foaming at the mouth with smears against other candidates boldly carrying the conservative mantle.
I said she is a tool of the establishment. Learn to read - there is a difference.
Because she threatens your candidate?
She doesn't threaten Sarah directly. But she will split the conservative vote by siphoning away Christian conservatives. Although Sarah is also a devout Christian, she doesn't use it politically as Huckabee and Bachmann does. And we cannot afford to have this split again as we did in 2008.
If you had any confidence in your own candidate, you wouldn't have be foaming at the mouth with smears against other candidates boldly carrying the conservative mantle.
I have tons of confidence in Governor Palin and I am going after Bachmann because SHE STARTED IT FIRST when she hired that pond scum Ed Rollins to attack Palin even though she's not in the race yet. And the fact that she hired Ed Rollins means she is wedded to conventional beltway political strategy at a time when we need a Napoleon.
Then, you're a paranoid kook.
There isn't a bigger advocate of conservatism in congress. It's sad when a 100% conservative is attacked for being something she clearly isn't.
There is no hope for conservatism when people like you viciously try to undermine politicians that are trying to do the right thing.
Here you are now attacking EEE, another highly respected poster.
Fool was a poor choice of words, did not mean it literally as the Scripture you mentioned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.