So, you accept what Obama produces, because it likely represents the truth.
Ok - not exactly Woodward, or ‘Buckhead’, or The Enquirer with a stained blue dress, but it is reasonable to just accept on faith in the office of the president, that what that offices produces is truth.
Thanks for offering up your perspective.
I don't know about you, but I accept the document as legitimate because the state of Hawaii says it is legitimate. No faith in Obama's word (and I have none) is necessary.
“So, you accept what Obama produces, because it likely represents the truth.
Ok - not exactly Woodward, or ‘Buckhead’, or The Enquirer with a stained blue dress, but it is reasonable to just accept on faith in the office of the president, that what that offices produces is truth.
Thanks for offering up your perspective.”
What if the “truth” is as simple as Dr. David A. Sinclair, the attending physician named on the birth certificate was asked by the grandparents, the Dunhams or by Stanley Ann Obama or by Obama Senior or all of the above to create a birth certificate for Ann’s new baby and he was willing to send a birth record to the Hawaii Health Bureau thus creating a faux Hawaii “birth record” for the child that has been on file since August 8, 1961?
Perhaps Dr. Sinclair buried the Obama certificate in a stack of birth records for children born over that first weekend of August, 1961 so as not to draw any particular attention to it, which is why the Obama certificate number is out of sequence with the Nordyke Twins who were born after baby Obama.
Hospitals don’t keep records of their admissions or of a routine birthing procedure for 50 years. No one would ever know if a false record had been created back in 1961.
This method has been used recently to create anchor bady records for illegal aliens but it’s much more difficult to accomplish in the age of computers.
Here’s a link to a federal government white paper on the problem of faked birth certificates:
http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf