[Kleon]

The fact that there are different-sized pixels throughout the document indicates, without a doubt, that the document has been altered from its original state. It is possible that the alteration is solely the result of a standard optimization process, but regardless – the presence of differently-sized pixels clearly indicates that the document is not an exact duplicate of an original document scan.

Well, duh. It's never been about whether the document is an exact duplicate or not, because it clearly isn't. The question is whether there is an explanation that doesn't involve forgery, and this expert believes there is, and she is correct.

[Triple]

“The question is whether there is an explanation that doesn’t involve forgery...” - kleon

Why not search for the truth, instead of a possible explanation for all the anomalies in the WH LFCOLB?