Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RonDog

I will admit that my wife and I were both in the “I don’t want Palin for president” crowd who put in the list of negatives that she quit. We like her, but her running for president just didn’t feel right.

This argument makes much more sense to me. I still don’t think she should run for president. We need someone on the outside forcing a Republican insider to do right. Once you get in the system you are controlled by the system. She can do more good cutting at the cancer from the outside than she can by getting inside and being controlled by the cancer.


8 posted on 07/12/2011 3:41:59 AM PDT by cizinec ("Brother, your best friend ain't your Momma, it's the Field Artillery.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cizinec
This argument makes much more sense to me.
Excellent!
Then, you're going to LOVE the movie!

13 posted on 07/12/2011 3:51:36 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cizinec; RonDog

Philosophy may attract some people to vote. But a candidate must energize people.

Look at how Arnold became gov. of Call lee forn nee yah.
Look how we have this teleprompter reader as president.
They carried no philosophical message, but carried the people’s emotions.

If you work sales, you understand that people buy/don’t buy from emotion, not logic.

You must excite people. The republican candidate, unlike the democrat candidate, must carry philosophy as well as excitement. That person is Sarah Palin, who stands above the other suits.

She should team up with Marco Rubio. That would be one heck of a ticket.


31 posted on 07/12/2011 8:21:54 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Democrats: debt, dependence and derision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson