Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/11/2011 5:48:52 PM PDT by AfricanChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AfricanChristian

I think you need a thick runway to land one on.


2 posted on 07/11/2011 5:50:56 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian

In an Airbus, the pilot is only a voting member. As an old test type, I prefer dying due to my mistakes, not the computer’s.


3 posted on 07/11/2011 5:54:48 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian
Why U.S. Airlines Don't Fly the Airbus A380

Because the schedule would never work - it would take the TSA a week to sexually molest all of the passengers it holds.

4 posted on 07/11/2011 5:56:40 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian
600 passengers??????

Probably take longer to board and deplane than the actual flight.

6 posted on 07/11/2011 5:57:30 PM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian

It takes 600 pair of white nuckles (gripping the seat arms) just to raise this puppy off the ground.


7 posted on 07/11/2011 5:57:37 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian
As the article said (after an interminable wait for the second page to load) (North) Americans prefer frequent smaller flights.

Man, that site is quite the “hit-whore”, though: the second article that interested me there would have needed 5 more clicks after the initial one to read the whole thing. I'll pass, thanks.

8 posted on 07/11/2011 6:01:38 PM PDT by Don W (You can forget what you do for a living when your knees are in the breeze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian

Isn’t Occam’s Razor applicable here - the infrastructure at virtually all US airports isn’t current configured to handle a double-decker jumbo jet that can deplane 600 people at once.


9 posted on 07/11/2011 6:03:55 PM PDT by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian
I kinda miss the Boeing 707. That plane really said "USA" just as much as the big 747 . . .


10 posted on 07/11/2011 6:04:33 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian
U.S. Airlines are more interested in point to point flights to foreign destinations. European and Asian carriers see themselves as global airlines which use their regional hubs as a way to connect American and European countries to other countries. Cathay Pacific connects many European and American cities to dozens of Asian countries. After all, there is only one city in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Lufthansa connects North and South American cities to many European, African, and Asian countries. After all, there are only a half a dozen domestic German destinations, and most of those are available from via nonstop flights.

If tomorrow, American Airlines decided one of its primary missions was to connect European travelers to South America, it might see a need for an airplane like the A380.

11 posted on 07/11/2011 6:07:36 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian
Three U.S. carriers are also the world's three biggest airlines -- United(UAL_), Delta(DAL_) and American(AMR_) -- but little indication exists that any of them have any particular desire to fly the world's biggest passenger airplane.

That's OK, I don't have any particular desire to fly United, Delta or American on any routes that an A380 would take. Many foreign airlines are just flat out better - newer planes, nicer interiors and seats, and much better flight attendant attitudes.
17 posted on 07/11/2011 6:36:18 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian

If it ain’t Boeing.... I ain’t going.


18 posted on 07/11/2011 6:42:10 PM PDT by Feckless (I was trained by the US Government to Kill Commies and Radical Moo-slims. Now ain't that irOnic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian

From what I’ve seen, US terminal gates aren’t designed to handle boarding 600 people.


21 posted on 07/11/2011 6:50:05 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Choot him, Elizabeth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian

If it ain’t Boeing, I’m not going


22 posted on 07/11/2011 7:06:34 PM PDT by Figment ("A communist is someone who reads Marx.An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx" R Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AfricanChristian
Because the Airbus A380 is a BULLY!
23 posted on 07/11/2011 7:25:33 PM PDT by BufordP ("Drink me if you can't take a joke." -- Kool-aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson