Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray

It’s part of the same issue, not separate at all.

The testing is just even more evil.

And this - if it’s okay to test a non-implanted embryo, then why not test an implanted one and abort if “imperfect”? And, why not test born babies for imperfections? Or two year olds? etc.

There is no reason not to, according to the logic used to be able to test non-implanted embryos.

And anyone who is “okay” with creating embryos and killing - “discarding” - the unwanted ones, is justifying killing tiny human beings. Embryonic human beings are human beings, not giraffes, not generic “tissue”, not amoebas.


20 posted on 07/12/2011 10:14:45 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

It remains that your issue is entirely with IVF. The testing part is irrelevant. No IVF, no testing.

Since I’m not against IVF, and even considered it at one time, we have no common ground on which to further debate.


21 posted on 07/12/2011 10:19:05 AM PDT by Little Ray (Best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson