Replies

For those who care:

Since SOL won’t come clean and claims persecution, Here in most of it’s glory is the “Duty to Run” post that just slipped his mind...the reason I jumped him when he started the same kind of crap again on this thread with this post...note his opening comment/questions:

To: Gondring
RE :”Well, I wouldn’t hold it against her if she spent more time raising her family... maybe the younger ones won’t be as short-changed as Bristol and Willow.”

Even if she’s the only one who can save this country as president?
369 posted on Sunday, July 10, 2011 7:04:42 PM by sickoflibs

____________________________________________
Previous thread:

To: Norm Lenhart
RE:”That’s the only way she loses IMO... not even playing the game. If she doesn’t run she doesn’t. Her choice.....”

If that is really the case then does she have a duty to run?
74 posted on Saturday, July 02, 2011 9:41:11 PM by sickoflibs

________________________________________

And now, the rest of the story...
________________________________________

To: Norm Lenhart
RE :”No such animal as ‘duty to run.’ Don’t see it listed anywhere”

Not even if she’s the only one who can beat Obama?
76 posted on Saturday, July 02, 2011 9:50:52 PM by sickoflibs

To: Norm Lenhart
RE :”Show me this ‘Duty to run” somewhere legally binding. Her only responsibility is to her family and herself. Constitution says nothing about mandated running for office.”

Not in the constitution. To you.
If she is the only one that can beat Obama, and she is the best choice, and if she is sure to win if she runs, and you are sure she is running, then doesnt she have an obligation to you to run? Otherwise Obama wins and what? What valid reason could she have to let Obama have another 4 years? Her family? Herself?
83 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 10:52:29 AM by sickoflibs

To: Norm Lenhart
RE :”Since you say she has a responsibility to run -to me- personally,I officially absolve her of any requirement to run on my behalf”

***
OK I understand, you have a completely one sided commitment to her. You feel an obligation to tell the world that she is the only one that can beat Obama, and that she is the best choice, and if she is sure to win if she runs, and that you are sure she is running, but to you she has no commitment to you to run even if you say that gets Obama re-elected. I understand. Sounds completely rational.
118 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 7:06:45 PM by sickoflibs

To: Norm Lenhart
RE :”We brought Obama on ourselves by not voting for McCain/Palin when we had the chance remember? “

WHAT ???? You kidding? I had no more of an obligation to vote for McCain-Palin ticket as I would a Romney-Palin ticket or a Hillary-Palin ticket. If you want to convince readers of something positive about Palin, bringing up her relationship with that treasonous RINO is the worst approach. I am amazed that you would bring that up. It makes the ‘one-sided commitment’ approach look even worse.
124 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 7:32:43 PM by sickoflibs

To: stephenjohnbanker
RE :”The obtuseness here is staggering.”

Check this out: we brought on Obama by not voting (enough) for McCain in 2008 and so we have the duty to correct it by unconditionally promoting Palin as president in 2012 (and buying these tee-shirts) even if she doesn’t want to run herself, we owe it to her and America to support the run even if it is nonexistent. #93

You learn something every day.
135 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:12:59 PM by sickoflibs

To: sickoflibs

I seem to remember it was you talking about some mythical ‘duty’ on Palin’s part to run because she owed it to her supporters.

Now if you deny the fact that voting McCain/Palin in sufficient numbers by citizens of America, which many ‘protest voters’ did not, btw, would not have resulted in Obama losing the election, the obtuseness here is your own.

138 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:19:04 PM by Norm Lenhart

To: Norm Lenhart
RE :”I seem to remember it was you talking about some mythical ‘duty’ on Palin’s part to run because she owed it to her supporters.”

Nope, I just asked you :”If she is the only one that can beat Obama, and she is the best choice, and if she is sure to win if she runs, and you are sure she is running, then doesn’t she have an obligation to you to run? “

...and your response that ‘she doesn’t have to run if she doesnt want to in your eyes’ indicates a completely one sided commitment from you to her. I have no regrets that McCain was not president and have no one sided obligations to anyone least of all him.
144 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:34:19 PM by sickoflibs

To: sickoflibs

Total BS. You said duty. I said “No such animal as “Duty to run” and I asked you to find it written anywhere that she had a “duty” to run. Read it again. Closely...and with feeling ;) Read it ALL again and you, like everyone else here will see where your PDS addled brain went wrong ;)

145 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:45:30 PM by Norm Lenhart

To: Norm Lenhart
RE :”Total BS. You said duty. I said “No such animal as “Duty to run” and I asked you to find it written anywhere that she had a “duty” to run. Read it again. Closely...and with feeling ;) Read it ALL again and you, like everyone else here will see where your PDS addled brain went wrong ;)”

Why would I read it again when I just copied your comments? Just because you dont like what you said yet you dont feel free to disagree with it either, doesnt make me a PDSer. But that is an easy sounding out for you.
147 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:56:21 PM by sickoflibs

To: sickoflibs

Does lying in public arouse you or something? It sure amuses the rest of us so I guess it’s all good.

You did not copy my comments. You misrepresented them utterly, then you replaced your “duty” statement with “obligation”...two different things entirely ... which was not only the genesis of, but the basis for the rest of this time waster. And which anyone with eyes can go back and see for themselves. Yes, you do need to read it again, although it appears that understanding simple English is beyond you.

I stand fully behind my statements and you twist mine and yours alike. Which one of us is the fool here?

148 posted on Sunday, July 03, 2011 9:04:20 PM by Norm Lenhart