Approximately 70% of people who were polled across the nation disagree with the Anthony trial verdict.
Some say this was a verdict that snowballed out of control. Is that reasonable? How does that even pass muster at all?
How in the world can a jury render a verdict in a case as complex as this in less than eleven hours, before ever asking to examine the evidence that was on display in the court room, it’s bizarre…
Well the answer is actually relatively simple. They hardly ever took notes. Casey Anthony was acquitted by the jury on all counts of murder on July 5, 2011, when they ignored the evidence and believed her story to be evident that she held in secret while in jail for three years that Caylee drowned in her family’s swimming pool.
...By all means, it is incumbent upon us to exercise our 1st amendment rights to hold the jurors and all future jurors to an ever higher standard. The same standards hold true when the nation elects an anti-constitutionalist enemy of the free market. Follow the environmentalists...
Just as disgusting as the verdict is, I read this morning that some of the jurors have hired PR Firms and are willing to talk for 5 figures.
How many books will be written by the “jurors”? It is much more sensational with a not guilty verdict.
Is it possible that we are sunk that low or are we that dumbed down?