Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elendur

I wish what trials like this would do (and I’m not really for showing the proceedings on tv as they happen—I think there must be a better way than the circuses we have now) is to get the public to clamor for some changes in things like the way juries are selected. Is it REALLY the best idea to let the lawyers have such a hand in choosing jurors? Was this really what the original system had in mind? I somehow don’t think so.

When I see the system at work, truth and justice and fairness are never the words that spring to my mind. But the lawyers sure seem to like the status quo...


67 posted on 07/10/2011 11:52:08 AM PDT by brytlea (Someone the other day said I'm not a nice person. How did they know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: brytlea

I agree. The way juries are selected is the problem. Perhaps judges should select the jurors.


69 posted on 07/10/2011 11:59:10 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

One could argue that that poor, unfortunate little tyke is probably better off where she is now. Can you imagine growing up in that psychotic, deranged family?


71 posted on 07/10/2011 11:59:56 AM PDT by worriedinoregon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson