Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategy

I’ll huff and I’ll puff..... =.=


11 posted on 07/10/2011 4:31:36 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cranked
Say ello to my leetle frien.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
15 posted on 07/10/2011 4:51:09 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: cranked

First and foremost, did the Navy have the opportunity for a preemptive strike? Next, was the games presuming that there was no forward observation by recon units in both the air as well as assets on the ground in Iran?

Finally, it sounds like the Navy was trying to ascertain, based on current Iranian assets, what the result would be if Iran used those assets without retaliation. Sort of like fighting with your kid brother and letting him pummel you to see if the kid can give you a bloody nose.

Where I would have concern is going back a couple of years when a Chinese sub got within striking distance of a carrier group. I cannot imagine that the information gleaned by the Chinese wasn’t fed to Iran.


17 posted on 07/10/2011 4:53:18 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (As long as the MSM covers for Obama, he will be above the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson