[Kartographer]

"I don't think either I or Trumandogz were condoning the illegal (?) actions of the Lender."

Sorry, but I see no evidence of that in any of your post even this one you say 'well the guy made his bed' so he made his bed and gave up any rights and protections. Isn't that what you are saying?

[trumandogz]

I bet there is more to the story at the foreclosure proceeding had already been initiated or completed.

And while I cannot not confirm or cite, I believe that in some states, foreclosing on a mobile home is much easier than foreclosing on a real house.

Perhaps, they were just making an attempt to repo the double wide.

[Kickass Conservative]

Well, maybe I can't speak for Trumandogz on this. There are two issues here, the Homeowners failure to abide by his Mortgage agreement and the Lenders actions when the payments were not made.

I was commenting on the Homeowners actions that led to this, not the actions of the Lender.

My sympathy level goes down when people cause their own problems, in this case by not paying the Mortgage.

As I said, I do not condone the Lender's actions if they were in fact illegal. I have no idea whether the Homeowner was informed of the Foreclosure or not. His irresponsible actions led to the outcome, it's that simple.

If the Lender committed a crime, then the Lender will have to face the consequences. If not, this (former) Homeowner has no one to blame but himself.