To: sickoflibs; Nachum; Liz; AuntB; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; rabscuttle385
” Not quite ‘amnesty’, more like refusal to enforce immigration law. “
And the difference IS????
12 posted on
07/07/2011 10:14:07 PM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: stephenjohnbanker
The difference? Amnesty would be a change in the law (an unwelcome change) and a refusal to enforce the law is deliberate dereliction of duty. I’m really becoming convinced that 0bama prefers to do things the latter way.
13 posted on
07/07/2011 10:52:59 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
To: stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; Nachum; Liz; AuntB; DoughtyOne; rabscuttle385
” Not quite ‘amnesty’, more like refusal to enforce immigration law. “ And the difference IS????1) They can't vote legally (and more states are passing voter ID).
2) If they had official legal status, that would be a tremendous incentive for more illegals to come over.
3) Obama's immigration policies could be reversed by a sane POTUS in the future, if we ever get one.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson