You got so much wrong, I don’t know where to start.
The migratory molecule rule has nothing to do with the clean water act. It has everything to do with the fascist EPA persecuting a farmer.
The migratory molecule rule doesn’t exist. It was never passed by congress and nobody, including the Congress or the US Supreme Court, knows what it means.
It was an invention by the fascists in the EPA to destroy a farmer in Michigan.
I set this out as an example to expose that know-nothing leftist arrogantsob as the fraudster that he is. As I mentioned, arrogantsob couldn’t answer a single question I posed.
“Ed Muskie sponsored the “migratory molecule rule?”
Really? Give me a cite. You can’t. Muskie was dead many years before the fascist EPA tried to destroy the farmer with the pretend “molecule rule.”
Congress never passed a “migratory molecule rule.” It was an invention by the Nazi EPA to destroy a farmer.
“Soon after the Clean Water Act was passed, it was determined in federal court that Congress intended it to apply to more than strictly navigable waters.”
That’s bullshit. In SWANCC v US Army, the Supreme court very clearly stated that the CWA is very restrictive.
“There have been dozens of court cases confirming the CWA jurisdiction over these “Migratory Molecule” inputs.”
You’re really fishing off the deep end and don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.
There was ONE US Supreme Court decision addressing the stupid and insane “migratory molecule rule.”
“I’m not qualified to answer those questions...”
Ah, the first reasonable thing you’ve said.
“But as stated above, Congress determined, and the SCOTUS agreed, that many inputs are regulated under the CWA.”
What in blazes does that mean?
“The “Migratory Moleule Rule” came in response to SWANCC v. USACOE, so there’s not an issue of “butting up against” it.”
No, the migratory molecule rule was shot down by the Supreme Court based on SWANCC v US ARMY.
Okay, give it your best shot: Explain to everyone here what the “migratory molecule” rule is. I’ll bet a box of doughnuts that you can’t because you needed to be involved in the court case to understand the extreme fascist stupidity of the EPA.
Why are you yammering on about “farmers” and “migratory molecules” when this article is about the Clean Air Act case that Wisconsin filed?
And why do you get so nasty at those pointing out the fact that this is all to be laid at Congress’ door? Congress can change laws when presented with rational argument and proof. It has amended the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act several times each. It could abolish both.
However, belligerence won’t overcome the massive environmentalist propaganda which has inundated the population.