You have no rational explanation why they’d focus on the conversion issue and ignore the rather obvious tort case, so you’ve decided to go with cheap insults.
Okay.
Well, we’ll see what the full set of facts reveal, though I doubt you’ll be willing to acknowledge them.
The revevant facts are:
1. He had a legitimate check issued by Chase Bank.
2. A bank employee, call the police to have him arrested for presenting a fradulent check.
3. The check was real.
4. The guy spent a weekend in jail on a false charge.
5. The bank could have had him released at any time over the weekend after they realized the guy was innocent.
Everything else is clutter.