Except that the "small family" was in Seattle, not Honolulu.
Interesting how the reporter of this piece refers to information that was blacked out in redaction on the copy of Obama Sr.'s immigration file that has been made public. In the public version, the talk of the Salvation Army does not appear.
This version actually supports my theory that Obama Sr wanted SAD to abort little Barry, just like it appears later happened with the high school girl Obama Sr. apparently got pregnant in Boston while at Harvard. I doubt he would have told the INS that he was encouraging SAD to kill the baby in the womb, so the story that he was encouraging her to get rid of the baby through adoption sounds a bit better.
So if Obama Sr. wanted her to get rid of the baby, and I would expect that her Marxist parents also probably had no problem with abortion or giving the baby away, did SAD run away somewhere in order to have and keep the baby in spite of the wishes of Obama Sr. and her parents?
Did she go to Seattle in order to find support among high school friends or other relatives for keeping the baby in defiance of husband and parents? If so, where did she have the baby - did she have it across the border in a Canadian hospital as an indigent or in a home for unwed mothers?
Or did the reckless and headstrong young SAD go all the way to Kenya to find Obama's family and try to enlist them on the side of convincing Obama Sr. to keep his first born son (as far as she knew) and not get rid of it?
If she went somewhere else to have the baby in defiance of her husband and parents, it would explain the apparent shenanigans with the long form birth certificate.
Under this theory, SAD's mother registered the birth in Hawaii by submitting an affidavit of home birth after learning that SAD had gone ahead somewhere else with having and keeping the baby. Years later, Obama II, concerned about showing the world such a fishy document, comes up with an apparent hospital-generated long form birth certificate to satisfy his constitutional eligibility.
That makes a lot of sense. In fact, it’s the most logical explanation I’ve read.
NBC= Place & ParentS
Was there a Salvation Army home in either Seattle or Vancouver in 1961?
Wow. That's not good. For somebody, I hope.
Public is public.
Your logic has some merit.
Here is what makes sense to me:
SAD gets knocked-up by someone other than BHO, Sr.
SAD attends Univ. of HI and meets BHO, Sr. who is having problems with keeping his scholarship and temporary visa, uses his “purported” marriage to SAD to support his case to prevent being sent back to Kenya.
They were neither married or lived together.
Grandma Dunham arranges a local Dr. to fill out a late birth paperwork with SAD and then she is shipped to Washington State to stay with her aunt there. She has the baby in Canada. She decides to keep the baby and the doctor submits the late birth paperwork that she had already signed, prior to leaving HI.
She is seen by friends in Seattle with the baby and so soon after the birth that they comment she did not at that time know how to change the baby.
Immediately after the birth she is enrolled at the University in Seattle.
(no trip to Kenya, no return to HI. But also no hospital birth record in HI. What they have presented recently as a BC is clearly a forgery)
Good point. Why did this Boston reporter get access to the entire memo when Heather Smathers in AZ got the memo with that critical sentence redacted?