With all the publicity, they’ll have to go to Clearwater again for a jury. That way, the defense will be sure to get the “not guilty” verdict because there’s no video of this murder, and only “junk science”.
The defense will pin it on the handyman. They will villify and smear his character. They will make sure that they lower her seat during the trial so she appears very tiny, fragile, and not capable of such force. The Clearwater jury will be too overwhelmed by actual evidence, and too lazy to take notes. Then the defense can scream during closing that all the state had were “lies, lies, lies”, and point to the real killer, that handyman over there!
By jove, I think you have solved it. Maybe they could bring in references to the Lindbergh baby kidnapping which, years later, lead to a handy man/painter.
That old saw about, “There is no fury like a woman scorned.” is just that, and old saw. No truth to it at all, as long as we ignore the many ex-wives we have had and known.